Lawsuit Alleges Oxbryta Side Effects Resulted in Higher Rate of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis, Other Debilitating Symptoms


Allen indicates in the lawsuit that he was diagnosed with sickle cell disease (SCD) as a child, and just recently began taking Oxbryta in August 2024. However, he immediately began to suffer significant Oxbryta side effects, including pain, swelling, and a higher rate of SCD-related incidents, known as vaso-occlusive crisis.

Vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) occur when the red blood cells block blood flow, and the tissues become deprived of oxygen. This can cause an inflammatory response, which can lead to symptoms like pain in the chest, back and limbs, as well as fever. Patients often have to be hospitalized and can suffer kidney failure and stroke. Additionally, many patients can suffer death following a vaso-occlusive event.

In September 2024, just before the Oxbryta recall was announced, Allen indicates that he suffered a stroke and was still hospitalized at the time the lawsuit was filed.

The complaint accuses Pfizer of failing to provide proper warning about the risk of increased VOC events to the medical community and patients before the drug was recalled.

“At the time of injury, Plaintiff Tirrell Allen was unaware that Oxbryta had a higher rate of vaso-occlusive crisis,” the lawsuit states. “He was also unaware that there were more deaths in the Oxbryta treatment group as compared to the placebo group in post-marketing studies or that there were higher rates of vaso-occlusive crises in patients with sickle cell disease receiving Oxbryta in two real-world registry studies.”

In July 2024, European drug regulators warned that out of a clinical trial involving only 236 subjects, there were at least eight deaths reported among Oxbryta users, compared to two among patients given a placebo, the lawsuit reports. The study subjects were children between the ages of 2 and 15 years old.

In his lawsuit, Allen presents claims of strict liability, design defect, failure to warn, negligence, breach of warranties, unjust enrichment, false and misleading advertising, and violations of California civil codes.



Source link

Scroll to Top